Biomass Opponents Call For Tax Credit Repeal
,June 29th, 2011
CAMBRIDGE, MA (WAMC) -
A Massachusetts based environmental
organization is calling for an end to government subsidies for biomass
power. The biomass power industry says it is already being shortchanged
when it comes to taxpayer and ratepayer support for alternative energy
WAMC"s Pioneer Valley Bureau Chief Paul Tuthill reports.
A
report from the Cambridge Massachusetts based Biomass Accountability
Project argues that wood burning power plants should not qualify for
federal tax credits and loan guarantees under programs intended to
promote renewable energy. The report contends biomass plants produce
more green house gases than coal and contribute to air pollution that
causes respiratory and other diseases.
Meg Sheehan of the Biomass
Accountability Project notes the US Senate voted recently to repeal
enthanol tax credits and she says the case for ending biomass subsidies
is more compelling.
The biomass opponents held a media conference
call Tuesday to release the report,which details various federal grants,
tax credits and loan guarantees that have gone to biomass power
projects. The report claims ending government support for wood burning
power production would save taxpayers ten billion dollars over the next
decade.
The president of the Biomass Power Association, Robert
Cleaves disputed the report. He said biomass power has received just two
percent of the six billion dollars the federal stimulus program
committed to renewable energy.
In Massachusetts the administration
of Governor Deval Patrick recently proposed higher efficiency standards
for power plants to qualify for renewable energy credits. State
Senator Mark Pacheco, author of the state's Global Warming Solutions
Act, says subsidizing large scale wood burning power plants won't help
the state reduce its carbon footprint 25 percent by 2020 as the law
requires..
A 35 megawatt biomass power plant proposed in
Springfield would qualify for 46 million dollars in federal tax credits.
Lee Ann Warner has been battling the project for two years as a
member of the group Stop Toxic Incineration in Springfield.
The
Springfield City Council voted in May to revoke a special permit to
build the wood burning power plant. The developer, Palmer Renewable
Energy recently filed a suit against the city in state Land Court.
Frank Fitzgerald, the attorney for the developer, says the suit does not
seek monetary damages.
Springfield City Solicitor Ed Pikula said
he would review the suit thoroughly and file a response to defend the
city council's vote.















